Five questions help you identify the first representation condition to verify — entity record, evidence context, information clarity, technical access, or an observation baseline. No email gate. No vanity score. Just the next evidence step.
A scope review uses your diagnostic result, decision context, and website to determine whether a Signal Audit is the right next step.
Answer four brief questions so we can assess fit, decision timing, and the right scope. Your diagnostic result is included automatically.
This request does not create an engagement. We confirm fit, scope, and delivery capacity before any private payment instruction is sent.
We will review fit, the decision context, and the appropriate next step before proposing any engagement or payment instruction.
Can a machine identify you? Names, identifiers, structured data, people, and offers that agree across sources.
Do credible external sources corroborate your expertise? Experience, expertise, authoritativeness, and trustworthiness — verified, not asserted.
Is your information readable and internally consistent? Visible content, structured data, and accessible paths should agree within the scope being reviewed.
Can authorized systems reach the relevant pages? Robots.txt, sitemaps, server responses, internal links, and stable HTML are reviewed as technical conditions, not outcomes.
Do you have a documented context for observing the relevant pages, sources, and user paths before changing a material representation condition?